Judge questions Crown during closing argument at hockey sexual assault trial

In a high-profile case surrounding an alleged sexual assault at a hockey event, the prosecutor's closing arguments focused on the credibility of the witnesses and the events of the night in question. The case, which has garnered significant media attention, involves a former junior hockey player who is accused of assaulting a woman during a party following a game. During closing statements, the prosecutor urged the jury to consider the testimonies presented, highlighting inconsistencies in the defendant's account and the emotional impact on the victim. The defense countered by asserting that the encounter was consensual and questioned the motives of the witnesses. The courtroom atmosphere was tense as both sides delivered their arguments, with the judge occasionally interjecting to clarify points for the jury. As the trial nears its conclusion, the community remains divided, with supporters rallying for justice and others calling for the presumption of innocence until proven guilty.