Articles / Sunday Overreactions: Stagnant 3-on-3 OT must be changed

Sunday Overreactions: Stagnant 3-on-3 OT must be changed

S
Sportsnet
Nov 23, 2025 8:14 AM

Summary: This is a summary of an article originally published by Sportsnet. Read the full original article here →

The ongoing debate surrounding the NHL's 3-on-3 overtime format has intensified following numerous stagnant games that leave fans unsatisfied. Analysts and fans alike are questioning whether the current format truly brings excitement to the end of regulation or if it merely prolongs the inevitable conclusion of tied games. The structure, which was designed to reduce the amount of shootouts, is reportedly facing criticism as several matches have concluded without the thrilling goals that were once anticipated.

Players like Nathan MacKinnon of the Colorado Avalanche and Connor McDavid of the Edmonton Oilers have showcased their skills in various tight scenarios during regular play, yet when it comes down to overtime, the expected fireworks seem to fizzle. Many believe that changes need to be implemented to ensure that the caliber of players competing in this format genuinely reflects in the excitement of overtime play. Some suggest a return to 4-on-4 play or even adjustments in strategy that could favor offensive maneuvers.

As discussions continue, fans remain hopeful for an evolved overtime system that not only keeps the spirit of competition alive but also showcases the elite talent in the league, including stars like Auston Matthews from the Toronto Maple Leafs. For now, the stagnant nature of many recent 3-on-3 overtimes might push the NHL to reconsider its approach and reignite the excitement that fans and players desire at the end of close games.